How laid-off journalists can launch their own media companies
Just because local reporters are undervalued by huge media conglomerates doesn’t mean there isn’t a vibrant market for their work.
Welcome! I'm Simon Owens and this is my media newsletter. You can subscribe by clicking on this handy little button:
Hey folks! Today I’m answering questions from readers. If you have a question you want me to answer in a future newsletter, leave it in this thread.
Can you do me a favor first?
I want to get an accurate understanding of my readership so I can tweak my content to meet your needs. Can you simply tell me what industry you work in? This is completely anonymized so you won’t be revealing any personal information to me.
How laid-off journalists can launch their own media companies
The first question comes from Peter Osborne
If you were a displaced editor/reporter frustrated at the deterioration or disappearance of local journalism in your community, what steps would you take to try to duplicate what's going on in places like Baltimore (Banner) and NYC? How would you approach local philanthropists or prospective donors about investing without giving up editorial control?
The thing about legacy newspapers is that they often have extremely high overhead, especially when you account for office space, printing presses, delivery, and the padded salaries of all the executives who work for the parent company. A relatively small percentage of their revenue actually goes toward the journalists who create the core product.
That’s why I always root for laid-off journalists to launch their own competing publications. Outside of their own salaries, their overhead is extremely low, and they’re actually pretty well positioned to compete with their former employers, especially if they band together with their fellow laid-off reporters.
We’ve seen this work at the national level, the most famous example being Defector. After several clashes with management, the entire staff of the sports blog Deadspin resigned en masse, and then several months later they launched their own site. Under the framework of a writer cooperative, Defector monetized mainly through paid subscriptions, and by the end of the first year it was generating $3.2 million in annual revenue. Every single one of its writers is pulling in a decent middle class salary.
So let’s say you’re a journalist at a big newspaper chain like Gannett, Alden Global, or Lee Enterprises, and one day you get that dreaded phone call informing you that you’re the victim of a fresh round of layoffs. Commiserating with your fellow victims later that night, you decide that, rather than entering a dismal job market, you instead want to make a go at owning your own destiny. You all make a pact that night that you’re going to team up and launch your own media outlet. How should you go about this?
Here’s my advice:
Move fast
Given the unexpectedness of layoffs and the average journalism salary, it’s unlikely that most of the participating writers will have enough savings in the bank to delay a launch for any significant length of time. Also, in the wake of layoffs, there’s usually an outpouring of public sympathy, and you’ll want to capitalize on that sympathy while it’s still strong (more on that in a second).
Form a writer cooperative
Writer cooperatives are great for this sort of project because they align incentives in such a way that everyone is rewarded by the outlet’s success. They also create a fantastic framework for voting on and making decisions that will affect the business. For tips on how to structure your cooperative, check out this Business Insider article on how Brick House structures its writer co-op. Also read my interview with one of the founding members of a news cooperative in Bristol UK.
Reach out to community leaders
Local journalists are among the most well-connected members of their communities, with contacts within the upper echelons of government agencies, schools, nonprofits, and businesses. These are the very folks who can lend credibility and support to your new venture. Reach out to them and inform them of your plans to launch a new media outlet. There are likely all sorts of ways they can help amplify your efforts within the community.
Use off-the-shelf technology
Remember, one of your chief advantages is your low overhead. Don’t get bogged down in custom design and expensive enterprise tech software. Start with off-the-shelf publishing technology, and you can always upgrade later when you have cash in the bank.
Launch a concentrated pledge drive
As I mentioned, local journalists are unlikely to have much financial runway, so they need to build a financial foundation quickly. That means coming out of the gate strong with a concentrated pledge drive to build your initial membership base. This is when you leverage both the public sympathy and your relationships with community leaders to generate attention for your cause. Not only should you create a baseline membership costing between $5 to $10 a month, but you should provide an opportunity for wealthy members of the community to donate more. You also might want to reach out and find founding sponsors who will subsidize the publication in its initial months in exchange for prominent promotions on your website and newsletters.
Bring on a business operative
If your local newspaper had layoffs, chances are that they weren’t limited to the newsroom. By recruiting someone from the business side who already has relationships with local advertisers, you can scale up your ad operations much quicker and free up time for your editorial team so they focus most of their efforts on news gathering.
***
One final note: Back in 2019, right after Deadspin’s writers resigned en-masse, Substack published a tweet thread that was a “rough outline of how a team of writers might go about crowdfunding” a new publication. You should definitely check it out.
Those are my topline thoughts on how laid-off local journalists can spin up a publication with minimal financial runway. The last 15 years haven’t been kind to local reporters, but I honestly think they have access to all of the skills and tools needed to take their destinies into their own hands. Just because they’re undervalued by huge media conglomerates doesn’t mean there isn’t a vibrant market for their work.
Quick hits
Publishers are buying ads on popular mobile games that force users to scroll through their articles. [Marketing Brew] This is a bizarre practice. Can't imagine that this is anything other than an effort to juice traffic stats in order to fool advertisers. This is why you shouldn't waste your money on programmatic ad tech and instead should sponsor your friendly neighborhood Substack. I promise I don't do anything to goose the numbers.
"Efforts to bring [live video shopping] to western consumers have had a turbulent start, with low viewing numbers, poor sales, clunky tech and logistical challenges." [Financial Times]
THOUGHT BUBBLE: Kind of amazing that Industry Dive is a far less splashy publisher than Axios, yet it sold for a similar amount ($525 million). I'm pretty sure it also raised far less in venture capital.
"Everywhere you look, newspapers, magazines, and websites are ramping up their games section." [Nieman Lab] At The New Yorker ... “subscribers who play the crossword or quiz every day are more likely to renew.”
Medium is testing a tipping feature [Twitter]
Where are the newsletter ad agencies?
The next question comes from Joseph Choi
I’m curious to hear what you think is the best opportunity in the newsletter advertising space.
Right now we have:
1. Ad marketplaces (Swapstack, WhereBy)
2. Email sender (Substack, Beehiiv, Ghost, Letterhead)
3. Re-bundlers (Workweek, etc)
4. Adtech but not an email sender (Paved)
I recently had my newsletter acquired by a startup and have been diving deep into this space.
Are there other categories you’re seeing that are being overlooked? Would really appreciate your insight.
Here’s one thing I’ve always wondered: why aren’t there newsletter ad agencies?
There are advertising agents for just about every other creator medium. Take podcast networks as an example. Many of them don’t actually own the podcasts within their network. Instead, the main service they offer is selling ads. There are several benefits to this:
Lead generation: Most creators don’t want to waste their time cold-pitching brands; instead, they’d rather devote most of their time toward creating content.
Negotiation: It’s difficult for an individual creator to play hardball with a brand that’s demanding a steep discount. It’s so much easier to outsource that negotiation to someone who does it for a living.
Cross-pollination: A lot of brands don’t like to buy ads one by one. Instead, they like to buy bulk impressions across many media properties at once. Creators benefit from ad agency representation because they’re then included in these bulk ad buys.
Production/marketing: Most advertising agents are paid on commission, so they’re incentivized to help you grow your audience, which thereby increases your ad rates. So to help you grow, many agencies/networks offer both production and marketing services.
Take just about any creator category — Instagram influencers, YouTubers, podcasters — and you’ll find a vast ecosystem of agents and managers who specialize in securing brand deals for their clients.
And yet I haven’t come across any agencies that specialize in newsletter advertising. I can’t say definitively that none exist, but it’s clear that there’s a real market opportunity for someone with ad sales experience who wants to break into an underserved niche.
Just on Substack alone, you could comb through all the leaderboards and find hundreds of newsletters that have large, niche subscriber bases that brands would want to reach. Even medium-sized media companies probably aren’t selling ads directly within their newsletters and would welcome the additional revenue that an ad network could bring.
So who will be the first to capitalize on this opening in the marketplace?