5 Comments
User's avatar
Gavin's avatar

I wanted a third option on the poll - “Staying the same size but redistributing”. It feels to me like the traditional “aggregated” media organisation is becoming less common, but we’re all signing up like crazy to the more specialist sources that interest us specifically. So the total number of people in “the media” stays the same, but they are distributed across a larger number of smaller players. Although it depends on how you measure “size” - number of employers, number of employees, budgets....?

Expand full comment
Simon Owens's avatar

Yeah, it's hard to quantify, but I would be willing to be that the number of people who make either part or all of their income from creating content is either staying the same or going up.

Expand full comment
Bryce Payne's avatar

Thanks for reframing the narrative here. I wrote about SI and Pitchfork in my most recent issue and this is an encouraging counterpoint. I appreciate how you wisely (and correctly) expand the definition of media company and highlight just how long the long tail is.

Expand full comment
Simon Owens's avatar

Yeah, it's something that's always frustrated me how people will often equate the state of legacy newspapers with the state of the media industry.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Jan 24, 2024
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Simon Owens's avatar

I know how power laws worked and have written about their application to the Creator Economy. That paragraph was focused on quantifying the overall size of the Creator Economy, not determining how the revenue was distributed.

Expand full comment