Micropayments work in this very specific situation
Some Twitch streamers generate millions of dollars a year through "tips."

Welcome! I'm Simon Owens and this is my media newsletter. You can subscribe by clicking on this handy little button:
Let’s jump right into it…
Micropayments work in this very specific situation
As a journalist who covers the media industry, I get pitched on a new micropayments startup roughly every six months. The founders of said startup always position themselves as the cure to the ailing news industry, and they paint for me a futuristic utopia in which internet users, upon completing a web article, toss its publication a few coins from a digital purse. In aggregate, these payments will generate billions of dollars and return journalism to its pre-internet, halcyon days. But despite hearing this pitch dozens of times over the past decade, this utopia never materialized.
Of course, it’s not just the founders of micropayments startups who think that such a system could work. Occasionally I see a tweet from someone who expresses frustration that they’ve hit a paywall and aren’t able to throw the publication a dollar in order to bypass it. In these scenarios, the person is usually trying to access a local news site that covers a city they don’t live in, hence why they’re unwilling to pay for a subscription; they literally just want access to that one article.
But think about the economics of such a system; I very much doubt that a local news outlet could sell more than 1,000 individual articles on any particular month, especially if it’s also trying to convert readers into ongoing subscribers. Is the outlet really going to upend its entire business model and marketing just so it could generate an additional $12,000 a year? It wouldn’t be worth the headache.
But are there any scenarios where micropayments could actually work? In a piece titled “The micropayments mirage,” Axios’s Scott Rosenberg argues that the answer is no. “The theory behind micropayments promises the creation of a robust middle class of creators online,” he wrote. “But there isn't a single field test that shows such a scenario playing out.”
Really? Not a single field test? I can think of at least one glaring example: video livestreaming.
That’s why virtually every single livestreaming platform has some kind of tipping feature, and some top Twitch streamers make millions of dollars a year from audience tips. Here’s how they usually work: while the creator is streaming, tips will either flow across the screen or appear within the live chatbox. The streamer will then often acknowledge the tip in real time, either with some sort of thank you or by responding to the comment attached to it. Often, the tips are just a few dollars, although occasionally they can clock in at thousands of dollars.
Why do micropayments seem to work in this very specific scenario? Because the tips become incorporated into the very content itself; not only do tens of thousands of people see the tip in real time, but the creator themselves acknowledge it. It’s a way for the donor to become a part of the entertainment.
What’s more, I think there’s something gratifying about the act of supporting a live performer — a feeling similar to the one you get when you toss a few dollars into the cup of a talented street musician.
But this dynamic doesn’t translate well outside of livestreaming video. You don’t get a feeling of gratification when you pay a dollar to access an article. There’s no journalist on the other end there to thank you. It’s just a cold transaction, one that’s usually more trouble than it’s actually worth.
Speaking of rewarding creators for their hard work…
I may not have a Twitch stream, but I do spend my entire week recording interviews, conducting research, and creating longform articles and podcasts that are aimed at delivering you the kind of insights that will help you build your content business.
There’s only one way to reward me for this work: by becoming a paid subscriber to this newsletter. By subscribing, not only will you support my career, but you’ll also receive additional premium newsletters each week. Sign up using the link below and you’ll get 20% off for your first year:
My latest: How daily podcast The Smart 7 hit 5 million downloads in its first year
If your podcast is daily, then you can scale up your audience so much more quickly, and also there's lots more advertising inventory on offer.
Quick hits
This is cool: a YouTuber has built up an entire library of videos explaining filmmaking techniques, and then he occasionally incorporates his learnings into his own short films. [Tubefilter]
The New York Times just launched several subscriber-only newsletters that will be helmed by its opinion writers. [Axios] Here's my question: Are these newsletter writers getting paid any differently? Are they getting a cut of any subscription revenue they bring in?
How much does Medium pay per 1,000 views of an article? According to this analysis, anywhere between $15 and $40, depending on the niche. [Zulie Writes]
"On a typical day, a Jukin researcher will look at more than 400 videos in the hopes of finding gold amidst the garbage that is most user-generated content." [WSJ]
Reddit is raising $700 million at a $10 billion valuation. [Hollywood Reporter] Reddit is 16 years old. I can't imagine why it would need $700 million in additional investment this late in the game. It's generating $100 million in advertising per quarter, less than the NYT. It is really struggling to monetize its huge audience.
Why Medium is changing its writer payouts [YouTube]
I've been saying this for months: games are a great way for publishers to build user habits. Even something as simple as a weekly news quiz is likely to boost subscriber retention. [Medialyte]
Right wing outlets can get a lot of engagement on Facebook by simply spending just a little bit of money on ads targeted toward the people most likely to get enraged by partisan headlines. From there, the content starts getting shared organically. [The Markup]
ICYMI: The exact time commitment it takes to run a paid newsletter
It's impossible to run a Substack as a side hustle.
This newsletter isn’t the only place I hang out
I have a private Facebook group that I only promote within this newsletter. I spend a lot of time in it every day responding to questions and chatting about media industry news. You can join over here: [Facebook]
Do you like this newsletter?
Then you should subscribe here:
Simon Owens is a tech and media journalist living in Washington, DC. Follow him on Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn. Email him at simonowens@gmail.com. For a full bio, go here.
Why, in your view, does allowing one-off micropayments upend the entire business model? I see it as an add-on, not something that would cannibalize the subscriber model. It seems like subscriber and one-off purchasers are different target markets. Did anyone ever suggest doing away with newstands because they cannibalized subscriptions?